History of the Jihad - Raymond's comments on Quran Daily News on the War on Jihad

Site Map

This site brings you the history of the Islamic Jihad from its beginnings at Mecca in 620 C.E. up to 9/11, and the lessons it has for us in today’s challenging times. If we are to understand Islam, we need to understand the temperament of its founder Mohammed (PBUH*), the way victorious Muslims have treated the subject people, and above all the reasons for the victory of Islam thus far in the JIHAD.

Breaking News

What is Jihad: The Arabic word Jihad is derived from the root word Jahada (struggle). Jihad has come to mean an offensive war to be waged by Muslims against all non-Muslims to convert them to Islam on the pain of death. Jihad is enjoined on all Muslims by the Quran.

This site brings you the history of the Islamic Jihad from a neutral and factual viewpoint.

Outlook of this website:

This site is against all forms of fanaticism – religious and non-religious. But the emotional appeal of non-religious fanaticism like Nazism, Fascism or Communism is not as pervasive as that of fanaticism based on religion. When fanaticism and religion are mixed, we have a very potent and dangerous brew that can sustain itself for centuries unlike non-religious fanaticisms like Nazism and Communism which die out when the ringleaders are defeated. This is so, since religion is based on the psychological weakness of all humans, when we humans try to comprehend the unknown (universe). This understanding is (and perhaps will always remain) incomplete.

Religion tries to complete this incompleteness by fantasizing that the unknown is a god and that this god is the creator of all things that happen in this world and the universe. This idea that there is a god, which is assumed to be the unknown power in the universe makes the human mind paranoid because of our fear of the unknown. And this paranoia drives humans to do anything to propitiate this unknown power that is assumed to exist. This is what transforms this weakness of our human mind into a sickness. It is this sickness of the mind that drives humans to undertake wild acts like suicide bombings, fight holy wars, forced conversion, slaughter of humans who give a different name to this assumed power called god, etc, under the delusion of trying to please the unknown power that is assumed to be behind all existence.

While all forms of religious fanaticism are negative, only Islam raises slaughter of all Kafirs (non-Muslims) to a holy creed, it teaches Muslims to gloat over the killing of non-Muslims and celebrate their death. Hence Islam is the most demented and dangerous form of religious fanaticism. And it is not Islamic fanaticism that is to be blamed for this, as Islam itself is fanaticism.

From its root to its fruit Islam is the most violent, and virulent form of this delusion that the unknown universe is a god and all those who do not accept this brand of fantasizing of the unknown universe have to be slaughtered. This is so since Islamic fanaticism was born in a barren and harsh desert environment that gave birth to the paranoid mentality of the Bedouin Arabs among whom was born Mohammed (yimach shmo ve-zichro - may his name and memory be obliterated), the founder of this blood-thirsty creed – Islam.

This blood-thirsty Muslim mentality has trickled down to the newest convert to Islam be he or she Brown Black, Yellow or White. Most importantly it makes Islam the worst enemy of quest and science and of all human progress. While all religions are opposed to science as the Pope was to Galileo and Copernicus; but it is Islam which is the most blood-thirsty expression of this challenge of religion to reason. So Islam will have to be the first to be removed from the path of human progress and the reply to Islam to be effective would have to be more blood-thirsty and paranoid than Islam itself.

Those opposed to Islam will have to be like the hunter who aims his rifle between the eyes of the man-eater tiger and shoots till the tiger is dead meat. The hunter bears no enmity with the tiger, but shoots him dispassionately, so that he himself can live, and NOT end up by becoming the dinner of the man-eater.

This has to be the attitude, not based on a hate of Islam, but a determination to put a full and final end to Islam, so that Human society can progress without the hindrance of any religion obstructing its path.

After Islam is militarily defeated and then destroyed; the need of the day would be to come up with workable creative ideas, for brainwashing the remaining religious fanatics with techniques like anesthesia leading to amnesia and re-education of such brainwashed ex-religious fanatics; or the use of mass lobotomy to achieve the same result. Only such a technique could prevent religious fanaticism from being resurrected with a name other than Islam and insure the progress of human civilization without any obstacle from any religion.

To summarize, the religious outlook that claims to "know the unknown", as a god, allah, etc., is a sub-optimal human response (and so is a sub-human response). Violent monotheism is a criminal response which has brought our world to where it is today, post 11th September.

The need of our age is to start with the destruction of the most blood-thirsty form of religious fanaticism – Islam, followed up with the dovetailing of all other forms of religious fanaticism so that they move over and make way for rational-humanism. To make it more subtle; the need is for religion and religious fanaticism to move out of human minds and be replaced by rational-humanism.

Our maintaining this site, is our contribution for working towards this objective.

Chronological Jihads

The Jihad against Arabs (622 to 634)

The Jihad against Zoroastrian Persians of Iran, Baluchistan and Afghanistan (634 to 651)

The Jihad against the Byzantine Christians (634 to 1453)

The Jihad against Christian Coptic Egyptians (640 to 655)

The Jihad against Christian Coptic Nubians - modern Sudanese (650)

The Jihad against pagan Berbers - North Africans (650 to 700)

The Jihad against Spaniards (711 to 730)

The Reconquista against Jihad in Spain (730 to 1492)

The Jihad against Franks - modern French (720 to 732)

The Jihad against Sicilians in Italy (812 to 940)

The Jihad against Chinese (751)

The Jihad against Turks (651 to 751)

The Jihad against Armenians and Georgians (1071 to 1920)

The Crusade against Jihad (1096 – 1291 ongoing)

The Jihad against Mongols (1260 to 1300)

The Jihad against Hindus of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh (638 to 1857)

The Jihad against Indonesians and Malays (1450 to 1500)

The Jihad against Poland (1444 to 1699)

The Jihad against Rumania (1350 to 1699)

The Jihad against Russia (1500 to 1853)

The Jihad against Bulgaria (1350 to 1843)

The Jihad against Serbs, Croats and Albanians (1334 to 1920)

The Jihad against Greeks (1450 to 1853)

The Jihad against Albania (1332 - 1853)

The Jihad against Croatia (1389 to 1843)

The Jihad against Hungarians (1500 to 1683)

The Jihad against Austrians (1683)

Jihad in the Modern Age (20th and 21st Centuries)

The Jihad against Israelis (1948 – 2004 ongoing)

The Jihad against Americans (9/11/2001)

The Jihad against the British (1947 onwards)

The Jihad against Denmark (2005 cartoon controversy onwards)

The Jihad against the Filipinos in Mindanao(1970 onwards)

The Jihad against Indonesian Christians in Malaku and East Timor (1970 onwards)

The Jihad against Russians (1995 onwards)

The Jihad against Dutch and Belgians (2003 onwards)

The Jihad against Norwegians and Swedes (2003 onwards)

The Jihad against Thais (2003 onwards)

The Jihad against Nigerians (1965 onwards)

The Jihad against Canadians (2001 onwards)

The Jihad against Latin America (2003 onwards)

The Jihad against Australia (2002 onwards)

The Global Jihad today (2001 – ongoing)

The War on Terror against Jihad today (2001– ongoing)

The Vision for the post-Islamic (and post-religious) world

Guestbook - History of the Jihad (622 - Ongoing)

This site is dedicated to frank and fearless reporting and commenting to expose the Islamic Jihad

The History of Jihad site is brought to you by a panel of contributors. This site is co-ordinated by Robin MacArthur with Mahomet Mostapha and Naim al Khoury, New Jersey.

Other contributors to this site include professors and members of the faculty from the Universities of Stanford and Michigan (Ann Arbor), Kansas State University, Ohio State University, and the London School of Economics. We strongly suggest that this site be recommended as additional reading for students of Islamic History.

We also invite students and professors of this subject to mirror this site on your University or private servers, link it up from your sites, to print it as a non-profit publication and refer it to students, journalists, cinematographers, military personnel, members of both houses of Congress, and Parliamentarians from your countries, members of the judiciary and most importantly to officers of the FBI, CIA, Scotland Yard, MI5, Mossad, FSB (Russian Secret Police) Direction Générale de la Sécurité Extérieure (DGSE) and to all other stakeholders in the subjects of the Islam and the Jihad.

________________________

How our guests perceive our site

______________________________________

At the Fourth Conference of the Academy of Islamic Research held in Cairo, in 1968, Shaikh Abdullah Ghoshah, Chief Judge of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan declared: “Jihad is legislated in order to be one of the means of propagating Islam. Consequently Non-Muslims ought to embrace Islam either willingly or through wisdom and good advice or unwillingly through fight and Jihad…It is unlawful to give up Jihad and adopt peace and weakness instead of it, unless the purpose of giving up Jihad is for preparation for future war, whenever the Muslims are weak, and their opponents are strong…Otherwise war is the basis of the relationship between Muslims and their opponents.”

___________________________________________

Welcome to our Guestbook

Feeding a snake with milk, does not create nectar, but nourishes its venom. Only a stick used resolutely to crush its head, can save us from the snake.

Moral: Implanting Democracy and Freedom in Muslim societies, do not make for Jeffersonian Democrats, but for Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood types of elected hoodlums. To save us from Muslim Terrorism, only a …………. (conclusion left to the reader’s sagacity).

_____________________________

Name of the Guest: Raymond :

Email address: rayguy23@hotmail.com :

Location: Not Stated :

Subject: Use the Koran to Dismantle muslim apologists :

Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:53:26 +0000 :

Comment: There are many contradictions in the Quran.

4 of the more obvious ones will be mentioned below.

Since muslim apologists are so fond of taking Quran verses literally whenever they come across any verse in the Quran that SEEM TO support facts, it is only right then to take the following Quran verses below, LITERALLY.

1.

Contradiction 1 : How many days did Allah need to destroy the people of Aad ?

Surah 54:18-19 says YUSUFALI: The 'Ad (people) (too) rejected (Truth): then how terrible was My Penalty and My Warning? PICKTHAL: (The tribe of) A'ad rejected warnings.

Then how (dreadful) was My punishment after My warnings.

SHAKIR: Ad treated (the truth) as a lie, so how (great) was My punishment and My warning! YUSUFALI: For We sent against them a furious wind, on A DAY of violent Disaster, PICKTHAL: Lo! We let loose on them a raging wind on A DAY of constant calamity, SHAKIR: Surely We sent on them a tornado in A DAY of bitter ill-luck

Surah 41:16 says YUSUFALI: So We sent against them a furious Wind through DAYS of disaster, that We might give them a taste of a Penalty of humiliation in this life; but the Penalty of a Hereafter will be more humiliating still: and they will find no help.

PICKTHAL: Therefore We let loose on them a raging wind in evil DAYS, that We might make them taste the torment of disgrace in the life of the world.

And verily the doom of the Hereafter will be more shameful, and they will not be helped.

SHAKIR: So We sent on them a furious wind in unlucky DAYS, that We may make them taste the chastisement of abasement in this world's life; and certainly the chastisement of the hereafter is much more abasing, and they shall not be helped.

Surah 69:6-7 says YUSUFALI: And the 'Ad, they were destroyed by a furious Wind, exceedingly violent; PICKTHAL: And as for A'ad, they were destroyed by a fierce roaring wind, SHAKIR: And as to Ad, they were destroyed by a roaring, violent blast.

YUSUFALI: He made it rage against them SEVEN NIGHTS AND EIGHT DAYS in succession: so that thou couldst see the (whole) people lying prostrate in its (path), as they had been roots of hollow palm-trees tumbled down! PICKTHAL: Which He imposed on them for SEVEN LONG NIGHTS and EIGHT LONG DAYS so that thou mightest have seen men lying overthrown, as they were hollow trunks of palm-trees.

SHAKIR: Which He made to prevail against them for SEVEN NIGHTS AND EIGHT DAYS unremittingly, so that you might have seen the people therein prostrate as if they were the trunks of hollow palms.

Well ! This is a SERIOUS CONTRADICTION in the Quran.

Surah 54:19 says Allah destroyed the people of Aad with furious wind in A DAY.

Surah 41:16 says Allah destroyed the people of Aad with furious wind in DAYS.

Surah 69:6-7 says Allah destroyed the people of Aad with furious wing in 8 DAYS.

This is a clear-cut contradiction that even an idiot can see.

It is going to be very difficult to explain this contradiction in the Quran.

Muslim apologists may say that Allah sent a furious wind to the people of Aad in a day and made it rage over them in 8 days.

But the problem here is THE QURAN DOES NOT SAY THAT ! JUST WHERE INDEED IN THE QURAN DOES IT SAY THAT ?????? Again in all the flawed arguments of the muslim apologists, the Quran does NOT say what they say ! What’s worse is that different muslim apologists will give different explanations for the various flaws in the Quran.

Clearly, the Quran contains contradictions and THE QURAN FAILS TO EXPLAIN ITSELF.

Therefore, THE QURAN HAS CONTRADICTIONS.

2.

How many days did creation take ?

Surah s 7:54, 10:3, 11:7 and 25:59 all say that Allah created the heavens and the earth in 6 days.

But

Surah 41:9-12 says YUSUFALI: Say: Is it that ye deny Him Who created the earth in two Days? And do ye join equals with Him? He is the Lord of (all) the Worlds.

PICKTHAL: Say (O Muhammad, unto the idolaters): Disbelieve ye verily in Him Who created the earth in two Days, and ascribe ye unto Him rivals? He (and none else) is the Lord of the Worlds.

SHAKIR: Say: What! do you indeed disbelieve in Him Who created the earth in two periods, and do you set up equals with Him? That is the Lord of the Worlds.

YUSUFALI: He set on the (earth), mountains standing firm, high above it, and bestowed blessings on the earth, and measure therein all things to give them nourishment in due proportion, in four Days, in accordance with (the needs of) those who seek (Sustenance).

PICKTHAL: He placed therein firm hills rising above it, and blessed it and measured therein its sustenance in four Days, alike for (all) who ask; SHAKIR: And He made in it mountains above its surface, and He blessed therein and made therein its foods, in four periods: alike for the seekers.

YUSUFALI: Moreover He comprehended in His design the sky, and it had been (as) smoke: He said to it and to the earth: "Come ye together, willingly or unwillingly.

" They said: "We do come (together), in willing obedience.

" PICKTHAL: Then turned He to the heaven when it was smoke, and said unto it and unto the earth: Come both of you, willingly or loth.

They said: We come, obedient.

SHAKIR: Then He directed Himself to the heaven and it is a vapor, so He said to it and to the earth: Come both, willingly or unwillingly.

They both said: We come willingly.

YUSUFALI: So He completed them as seven firmaments in two Days, and He assigned to each heaven its duty and command.

And We adorned the lower heaven with lights, and (provided it) with guard.

Such is the Decree of (Him) the Exalted in Might, Full of Knowledge.

PICKTHAL: Then He ordained them seven heavens in two Days and inspired in each heaven its mandate; and We decked the nether heaven with lamps, and rendered it inviolable.

That is the measuring of the Mighty, the Knower.

SHAKIR: So He ordained them seven heavens in two periods, and revealed in every heaven its affair; and We adorned the lower heaven with brilliant stars and (made it) to guard; that is the decree of the Mighty, the Knowing.

GOING STRICLTY BY WHAT THE QURAN SAYS, In

Surah 41:9, Allah created the Earth in 2 days.

Surah 41:10 goes on to say that Allah placed on the Earth firm mountains and blessed the Earth and measured the Earth’s sustenance in 4 days.

Surah 41:11 then says that Allah then asked the Sky ( Samaa) and the Earth whether they want to come together willingly or not and they said they will come together willingly.

Surah 41:12 then says that Allah then made the Sky ( Samaa) as 7 heavens ( SamaaWat) and placed lamps or stars in the lower heavens to guard against every rebellious devil, in 2 days.

[ In Arabic, the word “ Samaa “ means “Heaven” or “Sky” ( Singular).

And “SamaaWat” means “Heavens” (Plural).

Examples where the word “SamaaWat” which means “Heavens” (Plural) is used is in

Surah 23:86, 24:35, 24:64, 25:2, 25:59 etc.

] So 2 + 4 + 2 = 8 days !

Surah 41:9-12 CLEARLY SAYS THE HEAVENS AND THE EARTH WERE CREATED IN 8 DAYS.

But

Surah s 7:54, 10:3, 11:7, and 25:59 all clearly state that Allah created the heavens and the earth in 6 days ! Clearly and evidently, the Quran contradicts itself ! Muslim apologists may say that the 2 days mentioned in

Surah 41:9 is part of the 4 days mentioned in

Surah 41:10.

But the problem here is THE QURAN DOES NOT SAY THAT ! JUST WHERE INDEED IN THE QURAN DOES IT SAY THAT ?????? Again in all the flawed arguments of the muslim apologists, the Quran does NOT say what they say ! What’s worse is that different muslim apologists will give different explanations for the various flaws in the Quran.

Clearly, the Quran contains contradictions and THE QURAN FAILS TO EXPLAIN ITSELF.

Therefore, THE QURAN HAS CONTRADICTIONS.

3.

Which was created first, the heavens or the Earth ?

Surah 2:29 says Huwa Al-Ladhī Khalaqa Lakum Mā Fī Al-'Arđi Jamī`āan Thumma Astawá 'Ilá As-SAMAA'i Fasawwāhunna Sab`a SAMAAWATin Wa Huwa Bikulli Shay'in `Alīmun which means He it is Who created for you all that is in the Earth.

Then He turned towards the Sky and made them seven heavens and He is the All-Knower of everything.

Surah 79:27-30 says 'A'antum 'Ashaddu Khalqāan 'Ami As-SAMAA'u Banāhā , Rafa`a Samkahā Fasawwāhā , Wa 'Aghţasha Laylahā Wa 'Akhraja Đuĥāhā , Wa Al-Arda bada Zalika DaHaaHaa which means Are you more difficult to create, or is the Sky that He constructed ? , He raised its height, and He has equally ordered it , Its night He covers with darkness, and its forenoon He brings out (with light) , And the Earth after that He(Allah) Flattened.

Surah 2:29 clearly says Allah CREATED ALL that is in the Earth , THEN he turned to the Sky and made them 7 heavens.

So CLEARLY, in

Surah 2:29 and this is also supported by

Surah 41:9-12, Allah created the Earth and all that is in the Earth FIRST, THEN he turned to the Sky and made it into 7 heavens.

At this point in time, it is evidently clear that the Quran says the Earth was created first, then the heavens.

But then

Surah 79:27-30 clearly says that Allah created the Samaa (Sky or Heaven) and raised its height and equally ordered it and AFTER THAT, he flattened the Earth.

There is a clear-cut contradiction between

Surah 2:29 &

Surah 41:9-12 on one hand and

Surah 79:27-30 on the other hand.

Muslim apologists are going to have a very hard time trying to explain such mistakes and contradictions because first of all, the Earth was NOT created BEFORE the rest of the Universe, and secondly,

Surah 2:29 &

Surah 41:9-12 clearly say that Earth was created first, then the heavens, but

Surah 79:27-30 clearly say that the heavens were created first then the Earth.

And whatever the pathetic flawed arguments put forward by muslim apologists, the big problem here THE QURAN DOES NOT SAY THAT ! JUST WHERE INDEED IN THE QURAN DOES IT SAY THAT ?????? Again in all the flawed arguments of the muslim apologists, the Quran does NOT say what they say ! What’s worse is that different muslim apologists will give different explanations for the various flaws in the Quran.

Clearly, the Quran contains contradictions and THE QURAN FAILS TO EXPLAIN ITSELF.

Therefore, THE QURAN HAS CONTRADICTIONS PLUS MISTAKES.

4.

Heaven and Earth ripped apart or called together

Surah 21:30 says that the SamaaWat(heavens) and the Earth were RATQAAN (SEWN TOGETHER) but Allah parted them.

Surah 41:11 however says that Allah made the Samaa(Sky) ( which he LATER made into 7 heavens(SamaaWat) ) and the Earth come together.

There are very serious problems in the Quran here.

Muslim apologists will indeed have a very hard time explaining such mistakes and contradictions in their Quran.

To make problems worse for them, whatever their pathetic flawed arguments, the big problem here is THE QURAN DOES NOT SAY THAT ! JUST WHERE INDEED IN THE QURAN DOES IT SAY THAT ?????? Again in all the flawed arguments of the muslim apologists, the Quran does NOT say what they say ! What’s worse is that different muslim apologists will give different explanations for the various flaws in the Quran.

Clearly, the Quran contains contradictions and THE QURAN FAILS TO EXPLAIN ITSELF.

Therefore, THE QURAN HAS CONTRADICTIONS PLUS MISTAKES.

As we all know, muslim apologists are one of the most dishonest, cunning, deceitful conmen in the world.

These idiots delight in attacking other people’s precious beliefs but when shown the countless flaws in their Quran, Hadiths and their beloved Muhammad himself, they just simply stubbornly refuse to accept the obvious flaws and are willing to use every idiotic means possible to ‘defend’ the undefendable countless flaws in their own religion.

To debate with muslim apologists can really make one vomit blood sometimes.

Imagine telling a stupid, stubborn obstinate kid that air is gas and water is liquid.

But that stupid, stubborn obstinate kid simply and just stubbornly refuses to accept the obvious facts and goes to every ridiculous means possible to defend his precious but already proven wrong beliefs. When reading the arguments and claims of these muslim apologists, it is interesting to note that whatever their claims about their Quran or Hadiths, the Quran itself does NOT say what they say.

And the Hadiths themselves do NOT say what they say. Also, what these vile, cunning, dishonest muslim apologists always like to do is make all kinds of fantastic statements and say all kinds of wonderful things, and as and when convenient and suitable, they will quote one or two verses from the Quran or Hadiths to support what they say.

Those who are gullible might be tricked by these vile conmen, thinking that the Quran is so “amazing” .

But those who know how to think will never be taken in by the tricks of these vile conmen and upon careful scrutiny and analysis of just the Quran and the Hadiths themselves, one will realize that there is actually nothing amazing at all about the Quran and Hadiths and in fact the Quran and Hadiths are full of flaws of every kind. One will also realize that whatever the claims of these vile, cunning, dishonest muslim apologists, it is all actually what they themselves say.

The Quran and Hadiths actually do NOT say what they say.

And these vile conmen are in fact using and manipulating the Quran and Hadiths to support what they themselves say. From experience, the best way to knock down the Quran and Hadiths when debating with muslim apologists is to use the Quran itself to attack the Quran and the Hadiths themselves to attack the Hadiths or use to Quran to attack the Hadiths or use the Hadiths to attack to Quran. For example, in

Surah 10:5 of the Quran, it clearly says that Allah made the moon to be a light by itself.

And Surahs 25:61 and 71:16 further confirms the

Mistake in

Surah 10:5.

There is no argument about that ! But if some stupid, stubborn, cunning muslim apologist try to say that the word “NUR” means “reflected light” instead of “light”, then you may argue that Surahs 2:257, 4:174, 5:16, 5:46, 6:1, 6:122, 7:157, 9:32, 33:43, 33:46, 35:25, 42:52, 57:9, 61:8, 64:8 make absolutely no sense at all then.

And they make the already absurd Quran even more absurd, ridiculous and erroneous. Also, in

Surah 24:35, Allah is himself a reflected light ! Is the muslim apologist willing to accept such a degradation, insult and blasphemy to Allah ?????? Another example is this, in Surahs 21:33 & 36:40, the word “Kull” which means “Each” or “Every” in Arabic, somewhat like the word “Mei” in Mandarin, clearly refers to the sun and moon ONLY.

But if some stupid, stubborn, cunning muslim apologist tries to say that the word “Kull” in these verses clearly refer to “everything in the universe”, then he has a BIG PROBLEM.

The word “Kull”, is found in MANY verses in the Quran, sometimes referring to people, sometimes referring to animals etc.

If “Kull” means “everything in the universe”, then MANY verses in the Quran are clearly in great error and make absolutely no sense at all and they make the already absurd Quran even more absurd, ridiculous and erroneous. So you see, it’s not hard to debate muslim apologists after all.

You just need to use the Quran itself to attack the Quran and the Hadiths themselves to attack the Hadiths or use to Quran to attack the Hadiths or use the Hadiths to attack to Quran. Always keep them on the defensive and keep attacking them.

They will sooner or later fall apart completely.

And remember, it is their word against your word. The advantage is with you. Their Quran and Hadiths are in clear error and mistake.

And whatever they say or claim is NOT what the Quran or Hadiths say.

They need to make all kinds of ridiculous claims to “defend” the flaws of their erroneous scriptures and they say what they say and as and when necessary, just quote one or two verses from their erroneous scriptures to support what they themselves say. As long as we all keep up our efforts in tearing apart Muhammad, the Quran and the Hadiths, Islam is finished ! Islam : If you want to get an English translation of the Quran, get one by Majid Fakhry with parallel Arabic text.

It is the only really reliable and honest English translation of Quran.

http://www.allbookstores.com/book/1859641601 But with regards to

Surah 51:47, trust only the translations of Abdullah Yusuf Ali, Maulana Muhammad Ali and Ahmed Ali .

" lamusiun " does NOT mean " expand ".

" lamusiun " is only a word that Allah supposedly used to describe the vastness and greatness of his power.

You can check all English-Arabic dictionaries and all Arabic dictionaries and there is NOT a single word for " expand " as " lamusiun ".

There are many Arabic words for " expand " but " lamusiun " is not one of them because " lamusiun " does not mean " expand ". For an online transliteration of the Quran, please go to

http://transliteration.org/quran/WebSite_CD/MixNoble/Fram2E.htm With regards to

Surah 79:30, " Dahaahaa " does NOT mean " shape like an egg ".

The Arabic word for egg is " Baidah " and NOT " Dahiyah " .

The word “Dahiyah” is a word that comes from one of the NON-Arab tribes of North Africa.

It is definitely NOT an Arabic word and NOT a word that comes from the Arabian Peninsula or Muhammad’s tribe. There is NO such Arabic word as " Dahiyah ".

" "Dahaahaa " actually means " FLATTEN ".

This points to a clear scientific error in the Quran. If

Surah 79:30 HAD wanted to talk about the earth being shaped like an egg, it would have used a word like " Baidahwiyah ".

But " Dahaahaa " means " FLATTEN ". “ Dahaahaa “ is a synonym of the word “ SAWWAAHAA ( STRAIGTHNED ) “ OR “ BASATAHAA ( FLATTENED ) “. With regards to

Surah 39:5, the root word " Kawwara " has 2 conflicting meanings : Overlap or make in the shape of a ball.

Do not be fooled by the apologetic tactics of those muslim apologists. This verse has no scientific bearing at all.

To really understand this verse, check out all those websites mentioned in this e-mail that prove the flat-earth theory of the Bible.

Surah 39:5 was written with the exact same context in mind.

The Arabic word for " rotate " is " Dowrah " and NOT " Kawwara ". If

Surah 39:5 had wanted to talk about the rotation of the earth, it would have used a word that is connected with " Dowrah ". There are many verses in the Quran eg.

16:93, 7:178, 4:88, 14:4 etc.

that uses the Arabic word “ Yudhillu “.

“ Yudhillu “ means “ lead astray “ .

So when the Quran uses the word “ Yudhillu “, it is talking about Allah himself leading people astray ! Sick isn’t it ! Some muslim translators of the Quran try to take advantage of non-Arabs’ ignorance of the Arabic language by dishonestly translating verses that have this word to mean something else in order to hide the illogicality of the Quran.

Another clear proof that the Quran is a work of man that cannot defend itself.

If the Quran had wanted to talk about “ leaving astray “ or “ leaving to stray “ , it would have used the Arabic word “ Yatruku “ which means “ ignore/leave alone “.

Surah 21:33 of the Quran reads : And He it is Who created the night and the day and the sun and the moon.

Each moves in its own orbit.

In the Arabic text, the latter part of this verse reads “ kullun fee falakin yasbahoona “ .

The word “ Kull “ in Arabic means “ each “ or “ every “ , somewhat like the word “ Mei “ in Mandarin.

“ Kullun Fee “ means “ Each in “.

“ Falak “ means “ move “.

Some muslim translators of the Quran try to take advantage of non-Arabs’ ignorance of the Arabic language by dishonestly translating “ Kull “ as “ everything ” or “ all “ , which is wrong ! The Arabic word for “ everything “ is “ Kullushaiyin “ which is NOT in

Surah 21:33.

And looking at the context of

Surah 21:33, it is clear that it is NOT talking about “all things “ .

It is talking about the sun and the moon ONLY.

Another example where “ Kullun Fee “ which means “ Each in “ is used is

Surah 36:40 . The Quran is supposed to be the literal word of Allah, every word of it.

In verses where Muhammad is asked to pray something or say something, the Arabic word “ Qul “ is used.

“ Qul” means “ Say “ or “ Proclaim “ .

But the shocking fact is there are many verses in the Quran where it is Muhammad himself speaking on his own accord and NOT Allah.

In the Arabic text of these verses, neither the words “ Qul ( Say/ Proclaim ) “ nor “ Solat ( Pray ) “ are there at the start of the sentence.

Many muslim apologists have tried to hide this embarrassment by dishonestly inserting the words “ Say “ or “ Pray “ in the English or other non-Arabic translation of those verses.

Yet another clear proof that the Quran is a work of man that cannot defend itself.

Examples of such verses are 2: 286, 6:104, 6:114, 11:2-3, 19:36, 27:91, 42:10, 51:50-51 etc. Never fully trust any one English or other non-Arabic translation of the Quran.

Muslim apologists are fond of taking advantage of non-Arabs’ ignorance of the Arabic language to fool people.

So it is a good idea to refer not just to one but to many various translations of the Quran.

Then you can compare for yourself.

In the Arabic text, many verses of the Quran are very harsh, very illogical, very bloodthirsty and very scientifically erroneous.

Therefore, trust the translations that are more harsh, more illogical, more bloodthirsty and more scientifically erroneous because these are the more honest translations. There are now already many books and websites that point out the various flaws in Islam.

But only one thing is still missing, ie.

for one brave knowledgeble soul to write an English book ( English because it is the world’s international language ) that points out all the flaws of the Quran in its Arabic text and thereby also disprove the claims of all those muslim apologists about their Quran.

If that can be done, then books and websites that expose all the flaws of Islam will be complete. For those who do not know Arabic language, it does help to get a transliteration of the Quran with parallel Arabic text. Never trust what Muslims boast to you about the Quran unless you yourself know Arabic very well. Some of the books and websites below are written by christians.

For such books and websites, ignore the portions that supports christianity. Books and websites written by unbiased, open-minded freethinkers are the best.

The biggest flaw of Islam is Muhammad himself.

If Muhammad is proven to be not credible at all or is completely disproved, then Islam is brought down completely since everything in Islam, especially the Quran and Hadiths, come only from Muhammad. Some of the articles and books below give very good critical analogy of Muhammad.

There’s no need for me to write anything actually.

But for some necessary information, I will write a bit about Muhammad.

Let’s just examine the 5 pillars of Islam and we will clearly see that Muhammad is an inseparable part of Islam. 1.

The Shahadah : Ash hadu ala ilah ha ilahlah wa ash hadu anna Muhammadah Rasullulah ( I testify that there is no god but allah and I testify that Muhammad is the messenger of allah ) You cannot recite only “ I testify that there is no god but allah “ and don’t recite “ Muhammd is the prophet of allah “ .

That is forbidden or ‘haram’.

You must recite “ Muhammad is the prophet of allah “.

In fact, the Shahadah only came into existence after Muhammad came onto the scene.

Before that, there was never such a creed.

This creed never existed among the jews or the christians or all the pre-islamic arabs.

Only after Muhammad came onto the scene did it exist. In the first most fundamental pillar of Islam, Muhammad is already inseparable. 2.

Pray 5 times a day.

This ritual of praying 5 times a day was only created and instituted by Muhammad during his time.

Before that, there was never such a ritual.

Such a ritual was never practiced by the jews or the christians or all the pre-islamic arabs.

It only came into existence after Muhammad’s alleged debate with Moses about the number of times to pray in one day, in one of Muhammad’s sick dreams.

Of course, in the daily 5 times a day prayer, the Shahadah has to be constantly recited.

Also, when muslims pray, they have to kowtow to Mecca and only to Mecca, Muhammad’s birth place ! When they pray, they cannot pray or kowtow to any direction other than Muhammad’s birth place.

That is forbidden or ‘haram’.

They kowtow specifically to a black arabian temple called the Kaabah.

This Kaabah was a temple very idolized and very frequented by Muhammad and the pagan arabs during his time.

Also, when muslims pray, they have to pray in arabic only, Muhammad’s language ! They cannot pray in a language other than Muhammad’s language.

That is forbidden or ‘haram’. Imagine that ! Kowtowing to Saudi Arabia five times every day and speaking lots of arabic five times every day ! It’s like an indirect submission to Arab cultural ‘supremacy’.

Kowtowing to Mecca and praying in arabic would never have existed had Muhammad not come onto the scene.

In the second pillar of Islam, Muhammad is also inseparable. 3 & 4.

Fasting during the month of Ramadan and Zakat.

Like the 5 times a day praying ritual, this fasting during Ramadan ritual and Zakat thing was also created and institutionalized by Muhammad during his time.

Before that, there was never such a ritual.

Such a ritual was never practiced by the jews or the christians or all the pre-islamic arabs. 5.

Hajj pilgrimage.

This undeniably, is the most paganite and superstitious of all Islamic rituals.

Firstly, the Hajj is performed in Mecca, Muhammad’s birth place ! Secondly, all the rites and rituals performed during the Hajj were created and institutionalized by Muhammad during his time.

All of these paganite rites and rituals were never practiced by the jews or the Christians but they were very much practiced by the pre-islamic arabs.

To put it simple, there was no such thing as Hajj pilgrimage before Muhammad came onto the scene.

Hajj pilgrimage only came into existence after Muhammad came onto the scene. So there you have it.

All 5 pillars of Islam are very closely related to Muhammad.

Without Muhammad, they won’t and can’t exist.

Additonally, Muhammad is inseparable even from the Quran and the Hadiths.

Every word in the Quran came only from the mouth of Muhammad.

And many verses in the Quran are directly connected with Muhammad.

In fact, some verses in the Quran are Muhammad’s own words ! Take away Muhammad and you won’t have any Quran.

And of course, the Hadiths are all about Muhammad.

Take away Muhammad and you won’t have any Hadiths. Not even the Quran and the Hadiths are inseparable from Muhammad. Simply put, if you take away Muhammad and everything in Islam that is related or connected to Muhammad, from Islam, there is no more Islam.

Clearly and evidently, Islam and Muhammad are inseparable.

In short, Islam is Muhammadism. There are many scientific MISTAKES in the Quran.

10 of the more obvious ones will be mentioned below.

Since muslim apologists are so fond of taking Quran verses literally whenever they come across any verse in the Quran that SEEM TO support science, it is only right then to take the following Quran verses below, LITERALLY.

Mistake 1

Surah 86:5-7 says Falyanžur Al-'Insānu Mimma Khuliqa Khuliqa Min Maa'in Dāfiqin Yakhruju Min Bayni Aş-Şulbi Wa At-Tarā'ibi , which means Now let us think from what man is created , He is created from a gushing fluid , Coming from between the backbone and the ribs. What ??! Man is created from a gushing fluid coming from between the backbone and the ribs ??! This is clearly a BIG scientific

MISTAKE in the Quran ! When the Quran talks about the gushing fluid, it can only be talking about 1 of 2 things ie.

EITHER the sperm that gushes out of a man’s penis during ejaculation OR the water that SLIGHTLY gushes out of a woman’s womb during delivery.

If the Quran is talking about the man’s sperm, then it is clearly WRONG.

Sperm does NOT come from between the backbone and the ribs. From the Quran itself, it is quite clear that the ‘fluid’ that

Surah 86:5 talks about refers to the man’s sperm.

Surah 32:7-8 says Al-Ladhī 'Aĥsana Kulla Shay'in Khalaqahu Wa Bada'a Khalqa Al-'Insāni Min Ţīnin Thumma Ja`ala Naslahu Min Sulālatin Min Maa'in Mahīnin which means Who made everything He has created good, and He began the creation of man from clay , Then He made his offspring from semen of worthless water (male sexual discharge).

Surah 77:20 says Alam Nakhluqkum Min Maa’in Mahīnin which means YUSUFALI: Have We not created you from a fluid (held) despicable?- PICKTHAL: Did We not create you from a base fluid SHAKIR: Did We not create you from contemptible water? In

Surah 86:5, 77:20 & 32:7-8, the word “Maa” which means “fluid” or “water”, is used, and they all clearly refer to the same thing. And if the Quran is talking about the water that SLIGHTLY gushes out of a woman’s womb during delivery, then it is even MORE WRONG.

Before and during and after pregnancy, the woman’s womb is NOT AT ALL between the backbone and the ribs.

Also, as we know from medical science, babies are created when the sperm joins with the egg.

It then becomes a cell and starts developing from there.

Babies are NOT created from the water that SLIGHTLY gushes out of a woman’s womb during delivery. What is between the backbone and the ribs ? It is the lungs, the heart and the kidneys.

So is man created from fluid coming from either the lungs or the heart or the kidneys, and then gushing out of the body ? NO !

Surah 86:5-7 is a BIG CLEAR scientific

MISTAKE in the Quran.

Period ! And to continue to defend such a clear

Mistake is to be an absolute idiot. For more information and reading, visit www.faithfreedom.org and www.answering-islam.org and read their articles and links.

Mistake 2

Surah 79:30 says Wa Al-Arda bada Zalika DaHaaHaa which means And the Earth after that He(Allah) FLATTENED With regards to

Surah 79:30, " Dahaahaa " does NOT mean " shape like an egg ".

It is appalling that some dishonest muslim apologists actually have the audacity to dishonestly cheat non-Arabic speakers to such an extent. The Arabic word for egg is " Baidah " and NOT " Dahiyah " . There is NO such Arabic word as " Dahiyah ".

" "Dahaahaa " actually means " FLATTEN ".

This points to a clear scientific error in the Quran. If

Surah 79:30 HAD wanted to talk about the earth being shaped like an egg, it would have used a word like " Baidahwiyah ".

But " Dahaahaa " means " FLATTEN ". “ Dahaahaa “ is a synonym of the word “ SAWWAAHAA ( STRAIGTHNED ) “ OR “ BASATAHAA ( FLATTENED ) “. The word “Dahiyah” is a word that comes from one of the NON-Arab tribes of North Africa.

It is definitely NOT an Arabic word and NOT a word that comes from the Arabian Peninsula or Muhammad’s tribe.

Surah 79:30 is a BIG CLEAR scientific

MISTAKE in the Quran.

Period ! And to continue to defend such a clear

Mistake is to be an absolute idiot. For more information and reading, visit www.faithfreedom.org and www.answering-islam.org and read their articles and links.

Mistake 3

Surah 10:5 says Huwa Al-Ladhī Ja`ala Ash-Shamsa Điyā'an Wa Al-Qamara NURon Wa Qaddarahu Manāzila Lita`lamū `Adada As-Sinīna Wa Al-Ĥisāba Mā Khalaqa Allāhu Dhālika 'Illā Bil-Ĥaqqi Yufaşşilu Al-'Āyāti Liqawmin Ya`lamūna which means It is He Who made the sun to be a shining brightness and THE MOON TO BE A LIGHT, and measured out stages for her; that you might know the number of years and the count (of time).

Nowise did Allah create this but in truth.

(Thus) doth He explain His Signs in detail, for those who understand. The Arabic word “Qamara” means “Moon” and “NUR” means “LIGHT”.

“Al-Qamara” means “The Moon”.

Surah 10:5 CLEARLY says ALLAH MADE THE MOON A LIGHT. The word “NUR” means “Light” and it does NOT AT ALL mean “reflected light”.

Anyone who knows Arabic knows that.

If it does, then in the Arabic text of

Surah 24:35, Allah is himself a reflected light ! Is any muslim apologist willing to accept such an insult and blasphemy to Allah ?? Also, if as according to the LIES of muslim apologists, “NUR” means “reflected light” which it does NOT, then in the Arabic text, Surahs 2:257, 4:174, 5:16, 5:46, 6:1, 6:122, 7:157, 9:32, 33:43, 33:46, 35:25, 42:52, 57:9, 61:8, 64:8 make absolutely no sense at all and make the already absurd Quran even more absurd, ridiculous and erroneous.

Surah 10:5 is a clear scientific

MISTAKE in the light of modern science.

The moon is NOT a light and does NOT give out its own light ! The moon reflects light from the sun.

Of course, the Quran does not mention this at all because Muhammad did not know this.

Surah 10:5 is a BIG CLEAR scientific

MISTAKE in the Quran.

Period ! And to continue to defend such a clear

Mistake is to be an absolute idiot. For more information and reading, visit www.faithfreedom.org and www.answering-islam.org and read their articles and links. To add on,

Surah 25:61 says Tabāraka Al-Ladhī Ja`ala Fī As-Samā'i Burūjāan Wa Ja`ala Fīhā Sirājāan Wa Qamarāan Munīrāan which means YUSUFALI: Blessed is He Who made constellations in the skies, and placed therein a Lamp and a Moon giving light; PICKTHAL: Blessed be He Who hath placed in the heaven mansions of the stars, and hath placed therein a great lamp and a moon giving light! SHAKIR: Blessed is He Who made the constellations in the heavens and made therein a lamp and a shining moon.

Surah 25:61 CONFIRMS the

Mistake in

Surah 10:5.

It CLEARLY SAYS THE MOON GIVES OUT ITS OWN LIGHT !

Surah 71:16 says Wa Ja`ala Al-Qamara Fīhinna NURon Wa Ja`ala Ash-Shamsa Sirājāan which means And (Allah) has made the moon a light therein, and made the sun a lamp.

Surah 71:16 FURTHER CONFIRMS the

Mistake in

Surah 10:5 ! It is evidently clear from the Quran itself that the Quran says the moon is a light by itself and that is a BIG CLEAR scientific

MISTAKE in the Quran.

Period ! And to continue to defend such a clear

Mistake is to be an absolute idiot. For more information and reading, visit www.faithfreedom.org and www.answering-islam.org and read their articles and links

Mistake 4

Surah 18:86 says Till, when he reached the setting-place of the SUN, he found it SETTING IN A MUDDY SPRING, and found a people thereabout.

We said: O Dhu'l-Qarneyn! Either punish or show them kindness. Yes.

Surah 18:86 CLEARLY says that the Sun SETS IN A MUDDY SPRING ! What kind of nonsense is that ?! It is amazing how muslim apologists simply refuse to admit the many obvious mistakes in their Quran.

It is also very humorous how these dishonest conmen are willing to resort to any ridiculous means possible to ‘defend’ the many obvious mistakes in their Quran.

http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/SKM/contradictions.htm#3

http://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Science/sun_set.html

http://www.islamreview.com/cgi-bin/guestbook/guestbook.cgi?start_number=2650

http://www.homa.org/Details.asp?ContentID=2137353379&TOCID=2083225348

Surah 18:86 is a BIG CLEAR scientific

MISTAKE in the Quran.

Period ! And to continue to defend such a clear

Mistake is to be an absolute idiot. For more information and reading, visit www.faithfreedom.org and www.answering-islam.org and read their articles and links.

Mistake 5 If you read and research extensively with a very critical mind, into the Quran and the Hadiths, you will know that the Quran and the Hadiths say that there are 7 heavens and 7 earths.

And STARS ARE IN THE LOWER HEAVENS and ALLAH USES STARS TO THROW AT SATANS AND JINNS TRYING TO CLIMB UP INTO THE HEAVENS TO EAVESDROP ON THE QURAN. Also, in the so called “Night of Power” , known as “Layla tul Qadr” in Arabic, which is actually one of Muhammad’s sick dreams, Muhammad allegedly rode a winged horse and traveled from the Ka’ba in Mecca to Masjid al Aqsa, which is the mosque in Jerusalem( one OBVIOUS

MISTAKE here is the Jerusalem mosque, known as Masjid Al-Aqsa, was built more than 53 years AFTER Muhammad’s death ! And

Surah 17:1 clearly talks about the Jerusalem mosque itself and NOT the site ! ).

And from Masjid al Aqsa, Muhammad then ascended into the 7 heavens on the winged horse where he met the various prophets and eventually Allah.

( One wonders why Muhammad never saw and never mentioned anything at all about the Moon, Planet Venus, Planet Mars, Planet Jupiter, the Asterioids, the Solar System, the Milky Way Galaxy etc.

It is because the “Night of Power”, as well as the 7 heavens and 7 earths, are all just Muhammad’s sick dreams and lousy imaginations ! ) Anyway, the “Night of Power” clearly explains what exactly are the 7 heavens the Quran talks about.

And if one reads further, one will know that the 7 earths are actually referring to 7 hells directly below the Earth.

Absurd ! Yes, but that was what Muhammad actually believed in ! So let’s see.

There are 7 heavens directly above the Earth and 7 hells directly underneath the Earth.

Stars are in the lower heavens and Allah uses them to shoot at Satans and Jinns trying to climb up into the heavens to eavesdrop on the Quran.

( All these absurdities correspond ONLY with a flat Earth, NOT a round one.

This clearly proves that the Earth, according to the Quran, is FLAT ! ) Now what in the world are all these nonsense and absurdities !!!! It’s okay to take all these crap as ancient fairy tales but to accept all these nonsense as revelation and truth from God is totally preposterous !! It is also an absolute insult to the real God ! Yes.

The Quran, the Hadiths and Islam are an absolute insult to God ! And to continue to defend such clear mistakes and absurdities is to be an absolute idiot. For more information and reading, visit www.faithfreedom.org and www.answering-islam.org and read their articles and links.

Mistake 6

Surah 36:40 says Lā Ash-Shamsu Yanbaghī Lahā 'An Tudrika Al-Qamara Wa Lā Al-Laylu Sābiqu An-Nahāri Wa Kullun Fee Falakin Yasbaĥoona which means YUSUFALI: It is not permitted to the Sun to catch up the Moon, nor can the Night outstrip the Day: Each (just) swims along in (its own) orbit (according to Law). PICKTHAL: It is not for the sun to overtake the moon, nor doth the night outstrip the day.

They float each in an orbit. SHAKIR: Neither is it allowable to the sun that it should overtake the moon, nor can the night outstrip the day; and all float on in a sphere. What ??! THE SUN OVERTAKE THE MOON ???? THE SUN CATCH UP THE MOON ???? Let’s understand this for a moment.

The Sun and the Moon are MORE THAN 149 MILLION KILOMETERS away from each other.

The Sun and the Earth are also MORE THAN 149 MILLION KILOMETERS away from each other.

In comparison, the Earth and the Moon are only 384,000 km away from each other, which is LESS THAN 0.3% of the distance between the Sun and the Earth or the Sun and the Moon.

The Sun orbits the Milky Way Galaxy.

The Earth orbits AROUND the Sun and the Moon in turn orbits AROUND the Earth.

The Sun and the Moon are NEVER CLOSE TO EACH OTHER AT ALL at any point in time and their PATHS AND MOVEMENTS ARE COMPLETELY SEPARATE AND DIFFERENT.

To reiterate, the Sun and the Moon are MORE THAN 149 MILLION KILOMETERS away from each other ! To say that it is not permitted for the Sun to OVERTAKE or CATCH UP WITH the Moon is a COMPLETE ERROR AND ABSURDITY OF SCIENCE. ( If however, you understand

Surah 36:40 from the erroneous view of science and astronomy that the ancient Arabs and Greeks had, then

Surah 36:40 makes perfect sense.)

Surah 36:40 is a BIG CLEAR scientific

MISTAKE in the Quran.

Period ! And to continue to defend such a clear

Mistake is to be an absolute idiot. For more information and reading, visit www.faithfreedom.org and www.answering-islam.org and read their articles and links.

Just to add on, the latter part of

Surah 36:40 says “ kullun fee falakin yasbahoona “ which means “ Each moves in its own orbit “ .

The word “ Kull “ in Arabic means “ each “ or “ every “ , somewhat like the word “ Mei “ in Mandarin.

“ Kullun Fee “ means “ Each in “.

“ Falak “ means “ move “.

Some muslim translators of the Quran try to take advantage of non-Arabs’ ignorance of the Arabic language by dishonestly translating “ Kull “ as “ everything ” or “ all “ , which is wrong ! The Arabic word for “ everything “ is “ Kullushaiyin “ which is NOT in

Surah 36:40.

And looking strictly at the context of

Surah 36:40, it is clear that it is NOT talking about “all things “ .

It is talking about the sun and the moon ONLY.

Another example where “ Kullun Fee “ which means “ Each in “ is used is

Surah 21:33.

Also, whenever the word “Kull” which means “Each” or “Every”, somewhat like the word “Mei” in Mandarin, is used in the Quran with regards to heavenly objects, it is always associated with the sun and moon ONLY and it is always talking about the sun and moon ONLY.

Mistake 7

Surah 36:39 says YUSUFALI: And the Moon, We have measured for her mansions (to traverse) till she returns like the old (and withered) lower part of a date-stalk. PICKTHAL: And for the moon We have appointed mansions till she return like an old shrivelled palm-leaf. SHAKIR: And (as for) the moon, We have ordained for it stages till it becomes again as an old dry palm branch. What ????????????!!!!!! What kind of idiotic superstitious nonsense is this ?? Let’s understand this for a moment.

The Earth orbits AROUND the Sun and the Moon in turn orbits AROUND the Earth.

The Sun gives light to both the Earth and the Moon. Does the Moon traverse till she returns like the old and withered lower part of a date stalk ?? NO ! Does the Moon return like an old shriveled palm leaf ?? NO ! Does the Moon become an old dry palm branch ?? NO ! And if any muslim apologist try to give the pathetic excuse that that

Surah 36:39 is poetry or symbolic language, then IT SURE IS ABSURD POETRY & IT SURE SYMBOLISES IDIOTIC SUPERSTITIOUS NONSENSE.

Surah 36:39 is a BIG CLEAR scientific

MISTAKE in the Quran.

Not only that, it is a statement of COMPLETE SUPERSTITIOUS NONSENSE AND ABSURDITY.

Period ! And to continue to defend such a clear

Mistake and superstitious nonsense and absurdity is to be an absolute idiot. For more information and reading, visit www.faithfreedom.org and www.answering-islam.org and read their articles and links.

Mistake 8 One scientific

MISTAKE and ABSURDITY that the Quran mentions a few times is about the sky being broken or shattered during doomsday. In Arabic, the word “ Samaa “ means “Heaven” or “Sky” ( Singular). And “SamaaWat” means “Heavens” (Plural).

Examples where the word “SamaaWat” which means “Heavens” (Plural) is used is in

Surah 23:86, 24:35, 24:64, 25:2, 25:59 etc. In these following verses of the Quran, the SINGULAR word “Samaa” which refers ONLY to one thing , which in this case , ONLY means the “SKY” , is used.

So going strictly by the Arabic text, these following Quran verses are literally talking about THE SKY.

Surah 25:25 says YUSUFALI: The Day the heaven shall be rent asunder with clouds, and angels shall be sent down, descending (in ranks),- PICKTHAL: A day when the heaven with the clouds will be rent asunder and the angels will be sent down, a grand descent. SHAKIR: And on the day when the heaven shall burst asunder with the clouds, and the angels shall be sent down descending (in ranks).

Surah 55:37 says YUSUFALI: When the sky is rent asunder, and it becomes red like ointment: PICKTHAL: And when the heaven splitteth asunder and becometh rosy like red hide - SHAKIR: And when the heaven is rent asunder, and then becomes red like red hide. ( Some muslim apologists actually have the cheek and shame to dishonestly and cunningly interpret

Surah 55:37 to be something scientific when it is actually a BIG scientific

MISTAKE AND ABSURDITY.

)

Surah 69:16 says YUSUFALI: And the sky will be rent asunder, for it will that Day be flimsy, PICKTHAL: And the heaven will split asunder, for that day it will be frail. SHAKIR: And the heaven shall cleave asunder, so that on that day it shall be frail,

Surah 73:18 says YUSUFALI: Whereon the sky will be cleft asunder? His Promise needs must be accomplished. PICKTHAL: The very heaven being then rent asunder.

His promise is to be fulfilled. SHAKIR: The heaven shall rend asunder thereby; His promise is ever brought to fulfillment.

Surah 77:9 says YUSUFALI: When the heaven is cleft asunder; PICKTHAL: And when the sky is riven asunder, SHAKIR: And when the heaven is rent asunder,

Surah 82:1 says YUSUFALI: When the Sky is cleft asunder; PICKTHAL: When the heaven is cleft asunder, SHAKIR: When the heaven becomes cleft asunder,

Surah 84:1 says YUSUFALI: When the sky is rent asunder, PICKTHAL: When the heaven is split asunder SHAKIR: When the heaven bursts asunder, As we all know, the sky is nothing but air.

The sky is nothing but air.

In order that something can be cleft asunder or broken apart, it MUST BE SOLID.

But the problem here is THE SKY IS NOT SOLID AT ALL ! And this is a BIG PROBLEM in the Quran.

During Muhammad’s time, people in his part of the world believed that the world or the Earth was a big flat piece of thing and directly above it are the 7 heavens and directly underneath it are the 7 Earths where Hell is.

And the sky, which is directly below the 7 heavens is a big tent-like dome covering the Earth.

And the sun and the moon moves around and over the Earth.

And Earth of course, is fixed and immovable.

That’s why you can NEVER find a single verse in the Quran with the words “Arda(Earth)” and “Falak(Move)” together.

Muhammad was an ancient man and ancient men of course had erroneous views of science and the universe.

Muhammad was no exception. The ONLY way the above quoted Surahs can be properly and correctly understood is to apply Muhammad’s superstitious and erroneous understanding of astronomy.

Muhammad believed that the sky was a solid tent-like dome and so it is not surprising at all to see him keep talking about cleft asunder the sky or breaking the sky or breaking apart the sky.

But in the light of science, facts and truth, to talk about breaking or shattering the sky is COMPLETELY IDIOTIC AND ABSURD.

AND IT IS COMPLETELY scientifically WRONG ! And to continue to defend such clear mistakes and absurdities is to be an absolute idiot. For more information and reading, visit www.faithfreedom.org and www.answering-islam.org and read their articles and links.

Mistake 9

Surah 91:1-2 says Wa Ash-Shamsi Wa Đuĥāhā Wa Al-Qamari 'Idhā Talāhā which means YUSUFALI: By the Sun and his (glorious) splendour; PICKTHAL: By the sun and his brightness, SHAKIR: I swear by the sun and its brilliance, YUSUFALI: By the Moon as she FOLLOWS him; PICKTHAL: And the moon when she FOLLOWS him, SHAKIR: And the moon when it FOLLOWS the sun BIG CLEAR

MISTAKE here ! The Moon does NOT follow the Sun ! Let’s understand this for a moment.

The Sun and the Moon are MORE THAN 149 MILLION KILOMETERS away from each other.

The Sun and the Earth are also MORE THAN 149 MILLION KILOMETERS away from each other.

In comparison, the Earth and the Moon are only 384,000 km away from each other, which is LESS THAN 0.3% of the distance between the Sun and the Earth or the Sun and the Moon.

The Sun orbits the Milky Way Galaxy.

The Earth orbits AROUND the Sun and the Moon in turn orbits AROUND the Earth.

The Sun and the Moon are NEVER CLOSE TO EACH OTHER AT ALL at any point in time and their PATHS AND MOVEMENTS ARE COMPLETELY SEPARATE AND DIFFERENT.

To reiterate, the Sun and the Moon are MORE THAN 149 MILLION KILOMETERS away from each other ! To add on, the Moon is attracted by the gravitational pull of the Earth.

So if one says that the Moon follows the Earth, one has a point.

Strictly speaking, in astronomy terms, the Earth follows the Sun and the Moon in turn follows the Earth.

Not surprisingly though, you CANNOT find a single verse in the Quran that says that the Moon follows the Earth.

And you also CANNOT find a single verse in the Quran that says that the Earth follows the Sun.

Because Muhammad never knew any of that.

( If however, you understand

Surah 91:1-2 from the erroneous view of science and astronomy that the ancient Arabs and Greeks had, then

Surah 91:1-2 makes perfect sense.) And no matter how the muslim apologists try desperately to explain it, it just does NOT make sense to say that the Moon follows the Sun.

It is a CLEAR

MISTAKE to say such a thing ! The ONLY way

Surah 91:1-2 can make sense is to understand from the erroneous view of science and astronomy that the ancient Arabs and Greeks had.

Surah 91:1-2 is a BIG CLEAR scientific

MISTAKE in the Quran.

Period ! And to continue to defend such a clear

Mistake is to be an absolute idiot. For more information and reading, visit www.faithfreedom.org and www.answering-islam.org and read their articles and links.

Mistake 10

Surah 81:1-2 says YUSUFALI: When the sun (with its spacious light) is folded up; PICKTHAL: When the sun is overthrown, SHAKIR: When the sun is covered, YUSUFALI: When the stars FALL, losing their lustre; PICKTHAL: And when the stars FALL, SHAKIR: And when the stars FALL, What ?????????? Stars fall ?????? And yes,

Surah 81:1-2 says STARS(plural), not star(singular). Muhammad never ceases to humour people with his superstitious and erroneous understanding of science and astronomy.

Like many people in ancient Arabia, he too believed that stars are little bright lights hanging in the sky which Allah sometimes uses to shoot at Jinns and Satans trying to climb up into the heavens to eavesdrop on the Quran.

If you understand

Surah 81:1-2 in this context, then

Surah 81:1-2 makes perfect sense.

But in the light of truth, facts science and astronomy,

Surah 81:1-2 is COMPLETELY ABSURD AND WRONG.

A Star is an enormously huge astronomical object that is very intense in the light and heat it gives out.

An example would be our Sun.

The Sun, which is only an average Star, is 10,000 times bigger than the Earth.

Despite being more than 149 million kilometers away from the Earth, we can still feel its heat from here.

And if the Earth so much as gets within just one million kilometers of the Sun, the Earth will be burned completely.

The next nearest star, which is Alpha Centauri, is 4.3 light-years away from the solar system ! JUST HOW CAN STARS FALL IS SOMETHING NO UNBIASED, UNPREJUDICED, LOGICAL EDUCATED PERSON CAN POSSIBLY ACCEPT !

Surah 81:1-2 is a BIG CLEAR scientific

MISTAKE in the Quran.

Period ! And to continue to defend such a clear

Mistake is to be an absolute idiot. For more information and reading, visit www.faithfreedom.org and www.answering-islam.org and read their articles and links. Comment about the Quran The Quran is a very badly organized and badly written book.

It has no proper beginning, no proper sequence and no proper ending.

The very first verse and sentence of the Quran is in Chapter 96 ! Add to that are countless repetitions and many verses and sentences that have no meaning at all.

If the author of the Quran is a human being, he will most surely get an “F” for book writing.

And to ascribe such a lousy man-made book to God is an absolute insult and abomination to God ! How the Quran was created In fact, the Quran did not come into existence during Muhammad’s lifetime.

The Quran only came into existence AFTER Muhammad died.

In the year AD633, when Muhammad unexpectedly and suddenly died, what we know today as the Quran was in many scattered bits and pieces written on pieces of cloth, leather, bones, and stones and some parts of it in various people’s memories.

Later on, because Muhammad’s followers were continuously at war with the non-muslims, and many of the people who memorized bits and pieces of Muhammad’s revelations were constantly being killed, so in order to prevent Muhammad’s ‘revelations’ from being lost completely, Caliph Abu Bakar ordered Zaid to start collecting Muhammad’s ‘revelations’ into one piece.

But the Quran was not compiled and completed by Abu Bakar or Zaid but by Caliph Uthman bin Affan.

It was Caliph Uthman bin Affan who compiled and organized and finally produced the Quran.

Then he made copies of what he produced and sent them to various parts of the Muhammadan empire.

And of course, he destroyed all other copies of it.

So it was actually Uthman bin Affan who compiled the Quran into the 114 Surahs that it is today.

And it was Uthman bin Affan who compiled the Quran verses into the way it is today.

He sure did a very bad job in compiling and organizing and producing the Quran, considering that the Quran has no proper sequence at all, no proper beginning, no proper ending and is so confusing.

The Quran is just compiled and organized from the longest

Surah to the shortest Surah.

So the Quran should rightfully be called the Uthman Quran.

http://www.sunnah.org/history/quran_compiled.htm

http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/compilationbrief.html

http://www.truthnet.org/islam/Qurangil5.html

http://www.islamunveiled.info/compilation.html Dismantling alleged scientific miracles in the Quran 1.

Quran mentions about the big bang ?

Surah 21:30 says 'Awalam Yaraá Al-Ladhīna Kafarū 'Anna As-Samāwāti Wa Al-'Arđa Kānatā RATQAAN Fafataqnāhumā Wa Ja`alnā Mina Al-Mā'i Kulla Shay'in Ĥayyin 'Afalā Yu'uminūna which means Do not those who disbelieve see that the heavens and the earth were SEWN TOGETHER, but We parted them ; and We have made of water everything living, will they not then believe? The Arabic word “Ratqaan” means “SEWN TOGETHER”.

There is NO specific mention about the heavens and the earth being one piece originally and definitely NO mention AT ALL about any explosion.

Rather, what

Surah 21:30 CLEARLY says is that the heavens and the earth were SEWN TOGETHER but they were later parted. Is this scientific ? Hmm…Doesn’t seem to be scientific at all.

Let’s look at some verses from the book of Genesis in the Bible’s Old Testament, which was written at least 1000 years BEFORE Muhammad was born. The Bible , Genesis Chapter 1 Verses 6-12 says Then God said, “Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it SEPARATED THE WATERS FROM THE WATERS.” Thus God made the firmament, and SEPARATED the WATERS which were UNDER the firmament from the WATERS which were ABOVE the firmament; and it was so.

And God called the firmament HEAVEN.

So the evening and the morning were the second day. Then God said, “Let the waters under the heavens be gathered together into one place, and let the dry land appear”; and it was so.

And God called the dry land EARTH, and the gathering together of the waters He called Seas.

And God saw that it was good. Then God said, “Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb that yields seed, and the fruit tree that yields fruit according to its kind, whose seed is in itself, on the earth”; and it was so.

And the earth brought forth grass, the herb that yields seed according to its kind, and the tree that yields fruit, whose seed is in itself according to its kind.

And God saw that it was good. Later on in Genesis Chapter 1 Verses 20-22, the Bible says Then God said, “Let the WATERS abound with an abundance of living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the face of the firmament of the heavens.” So God created great sea creatures and every living thing that moves, with which the waters abounded, according to their kind, and every winged bird according to its kind.

And God saw that it was good.

And God blessed them, saying, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let birds multiply on the earth.” Compare Genesis Chapter 1 Verses 6-12 & 20-22 to

Surah 21:30.

Undeniably, Genesis Chapter 1 Verses 6-12 & 20-22 are far more scientific and far more sophisticated.

Not only do they mention that Heaven and Earth were one unit originally, they also mention that Heaven and Earth were separated and how subsequently every living thing came from water.

And they mention and describe all these in detail. In fact, one might suspect that Muhammad might have gotten the idea for

Surah 21:30 from Genesis Chapter 1. If one is willing to do an extensive and unbiased study, one will also find out that the idea of Heaven and Earth being one unit and later separated, was very prevalent in the ancient world. Simply put, there is absolutely NOTHING scientific or miraculous or special AT ALL about

Surah 21:30.

Muhammad merely stated what was common knowledge at that time.

And considering that Muhammad had many contacts with Jews, Christians and many other non-Arabs throughout his lifetime since he was small, it is inevitable that he would know about some common knowledge of that era. For further reference,

http://www.geocities.com/freethoughtmecca/bigbang.html 2.

Quran talks about an expanding universe ?

Surah 51:47 says Wa As-Samā'a Banaynāhā Bi'ayydin Wa 'Innā Lamūsi`ūna which means YUSUFALI: With power and skill did We construct the Firmament: for it is We Who create the vastness of pace. PICKTHAL: We have built the heaven with might, and We it is Who make the vast extent (thereof). SHAKIR: And the heaven, We raised it high with power, and most surely We are the makers of things ample. Notice that in all the 3 most respected and used translations, NONE of them mention anything about an expanding universe.

Because

Surah 51:47 does NOT talk about an expanding universe ! The word that created all the controversy here is “la mu’si’un.

In order to put an end to all arguments, it is important to clarify once and for all that in

Surah 51:47, the word “la mu’si’un” is a word that Allah uses to describe the vastness and greatness of his power.

In other words, “la mu’si’un” is used to describe Allah himself and NOT an expanding universe ! If the Quran had wanted to talk about an expanding universe, it would have used the word “noosi’uhaa”( we are expanding it).

That would have prevented any arguments.

But NOWHERE in the Quran do you find the word “noosi’uhaa”.

Because the Quran does NOT and never talks about an expanding universe.

In

Surah 51:47, “la mu’si’un” is the word used to describe Allah himself and nothing else. Simply put, there is nothing scientific or miraculous or special about

Surah 51:47.

Praising and exalting one’s own god is something every religion does, past, present and future.

3.

Quran talks about the rotation of the earth ?

Surah 39:5 says Khalaqa As-Samāwāti Wa Al-'Arđa Bil-Ĥaqqi Yukawwiru Al-Layla `Alaá An-Nahāri Wa Yukawwiru An-Nahāra `Alaá Al-Layli Wa Sakhkhara Ash-Shamsa Wa Al-Qamara Kullun Yajrī Li'jalin Musamman 'Alā Huwa Al-`Azīzu Al-Ghaffāru which means YUSUFALI: He created the heavens and the earth in true (proportions): He makes the Night OVERLAP the Day, and the Day OVERLAP the Night: He has subjected the sun and the moon (to His law): Each one follows a course for a time appointed.

Is not He the Exalted in Power - He Who forgives again and again? PICKTHAL: He hath created the heavens and the earth with truth.

He maketh night to succeed day, and He maketh day to succeed night, and He constraineth the sun and the moon to give service, each running on for an appointed term.

Is not He the Mighty, the Forgiver? SHAKIR: He has created the heavens and the earth with the truth; He makes the night cover the day and makes the day overtake the night, and He has made the sun and the moon subservient; each one runs on to an assigned term; now surely He is the Mighty, the great Forgiver. Notice that in all the 3 most respected translations, NONE of them mention anything at all about rotation. Again, in

Surah 39:5, just like in

Surah 51:47, there is a controversial world here And that word is “Kawwara”. The phrase “Yukawwiru Al-Layla `Alaá An-Nahāri” means “Night(Layla) OVERLAP the Day(Nahar) and the phrase “Yukawwiru An-Nahāra `Alaá Al-Layli” means “Day(Nahar) OVERLAP the Night(layla)” And the word “Alaa” in these phrases means “OVER”. To further elaborate, during Muhammad’s time, people in his part of the world believed that the world or the Earth was a big flat piece of thing and directly above it are the 7 heavens and directly underneath it are the 7 Earths where Hell is.

And the sky, which is directly below the 7 heavens is a big tent-like dome covering the Earth.

And the sun and the moon moves around and over the Earth.

And Earth of course, is fixed and immovable.

That’s why you can NEVER find a single verse in the Quran with the words “Arda(Earth)” and “Falak(Move)” together.

Muhammad was an ancient man and ancient men of course had erroneous views of science and the universe.

Muhammad was no exception.

That’s also why you can NEVER find words like “Galaxy” or “Solar System” or “Asteriod” in the Quran.

Because Muhammad NEVER knew NOR even heard of such things ! If he did, he would not have hesitated to talk to people about such things and teach them about it.

But the truth is Muhammad was an ancient man who had wrong erroneous views of science and astronomy and had never heard of things like “Galaxy” or “Solar System” or “Asteriod” ever before ! The sun and the moon moving around and over the Earth causes day and night and this explains the OVERLAP meaning in

Surah 39:5. Now back to the controversial word “Kawwara”.

This word has 2 CONFLICTING meanings : 1.

OVERLAP, which is the more common meaning and 2.

Make in the shape of a ball, which is the less common meaning. If one sticks to the more common meaning of OVERLAP, then it agrees perfectly with

Surah 39:5 and with the word “Alaa(Over)” and with the erroneous ancient view of astronomy that Muhammad and the people of that time had. If however, one wants to use the meaning of make in the shape of a ball, to describe rotation, then one will encounter problems.

First, neither the day nor the night is made in the shape of a ball over each other.

Such a sentence makes no sense at all and is absurd.

Second, the meaning of make in the shape of a ball does not go well with the word “Alaa(Over)”.

It makes the sentence look absurd.

Thirdly, THE ARABIC WORD FOR ROTATE IS “ DOWRAH “ AND NOT “ KAWWARA “.

If

Surah 39:5 had wanted to talk about rotation of the Earth, it would have used the word “ DOWRAH “ or a word that comes from “DOWRAH”.

It would NOT have used a CONFLICTING word like “Kawwara”, which can create so many unnecessary arguments. The Arabic word for “Rotate” is “ DOWRAH ”.

Not surprisingly though, you CANNOT find this word anywhere in the Quran.

Surah 39:5 does NOT talk about the rotation of the Earth.

Surah 39:5 is merely expressing an erroneous concept of astronomy prevalent in the ancient world during Muhammad’s time and place.

Major

Mistake in Quran Muhammad made a very big

Mistake when it comes to the Trinity doctrine of Christianity.

He thought the Christian Trinity consist of Father(God), Mother(Mary) and Son(Jesus).

Worse still, he even erroneously thought that in the Christian Trinity, God the Father is the THIRD of three !

Surah 5:116 says And behold! Allah will say: "O Jesus the son of Mary! Did you say unto men, worship ME AND MY MOTHER as gods in derogation of Allah'?" He will say: "Glory to Thee! never could I say what I had no right (to say).

Had I said such a thing, you would indeed have known it.

you know what is in my heart, I know not what is in yours.

For you know in full all that is hidden.

Surah 5:73 says Laqad Kafara Al-Ladhīna Qālū 'Inna Allāha THALITHU THALATHAtin Wa Mā Min 'Ilahin 'Illā 'Ilahun Wāĥidun Wa 'In Lam Yantahū `Ammā Yaqūlūna Layamassanna Al-Ladhīna Kafarū Minhum `Adhābun 'Alīmun They surely disbelieve who say: Lo! Allah is the THIRD OF THREE; when there is no Allah save the One Allah.

If they desist not from so saying a painful doom will fall on those of them who disbelieve. The Arabic word “Thalatha” means “Three” and “Thalith” means “Third”.

Quran is a disgusting man-made book

Surah 47:4 says Fa'idhā Laqītumu Al-Ladhīna Kafarū Fađarba Ar-Riqābi Ĥattaá 'Idhā 'Athkhantumūhum Fashuddū Al-Wathāqa Fa'immā Mannāan Ba`du Wa 'Immā Fidā'an Ĥattaá Tađa`a Al-Ĥarbu 'Awzārahā Dhālika Wa Law Yashā'u Allāhu Lāntaşara Minhum Wa Lakin Liyabluwa Ba`đakum Biba`đin Wa Al-Ladhīna Qutilū Fī Sabīli Allāhi Falan Yuđilla 'A`mālahum which means Therefore, WHEN YOU MEET THE UNBELIEVERS, SMITE AT THEIR NECKS; At length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind a bond firmly (on them): thereafter (is the time for) either generosity or ransom: Until the war lays down its burdens.

Thus (are ye commanded): but if it had been Allah's Will, He could certainly have exacted retribution from them (Himself); but (He lets you fight) in order to test you, some with others.

But those who are slain in the Way of Allah,- He will never let their deeds be lost. Many Quran translators have tried to soften the meaning in their translation by adding the words “in war” in brackets after the word “Unbelievers” but they are NOT there in the original Arabic text. With verses like these in a disgusting book like the Quran, can you blame the existence of things like Al-Qaida, Jemmaah Islamiyah, Hamas Militants, Taliban, Suicide Bombers etc. 1. Islam Exposed by Soloman Tulbure 2. Why I Am Not a Muslim by Ibn Warraq 3. What the Koran Really Says: Language, Text, and Commentary by Ibn Warraq 4. Leaving Islam: Apostates Speak Out by Ibn Warraq 5. The Islamic Invasion by Robert Morey 6. The Origins of the Koran by Ibn Warraq 7. The Sword of the Prophet: History, Theology, Impact on the World by Serge Trifkovic, Srdja Trifkovic 8. The Quest for the Historical Muhammad by Ibn Warraq 9. Islam Unveiled: Disturbing Questions About the World's Fastest Growing Faith by Robert Spencer, David Pryce-Jones (Foreword) 10. Twenty Three Years: A Study of the Prophetic Career of Mohammad by Ali Dashti 11. Islam and Dhimmitude: Where Civilizations Collide by Bat Yeor 12. Slavery in the Arab World by Murray Gordon 13. Understanding the Hadith: The Sacred Traditions of Islam by Ram Swarup 14. Jihad: The Origin of Holy War in Islam by Reuven Firestone 15. Islam and Terrorism: What the Quran Really Teaches About Christianity, Violence and the Goals of the Islamic Jihad by Mark A. Gabriel 16. Tea With Terrorists: Who They Are, Why They Kill, What Will Stop Them by Craig Winn, Ken Power 17. Jihad in the West: Muslim Conquests from the 7th to the 21st Centuries by Paul Fregosi 18. The Crisis of Islam: Holy War and Unholy Terror by Bernard Lewis (Author) 19. Inside Islam: Exposing and Reaching the World of Islam by Reza F. Safa 20. The Dark Side of Islam by R. C. Sproul, Abdul Saleeb 21. Secrets of the Koran: Revealing Insight into Islam's Holy Book by Don Richardson 22. Hatred's Kingdom: How Saudi Arabia Supports the New Global Terrorism by Dore Gold 23. From Islam to Secular Humanism: A Philosophical Journey by K., Dr. Sohail 24. Preachers of Hate: Islam and the War on America by Kenneth Timmerman 25. Prophet of Doom by Craig Winn 26. Islam, Christianity and Israel by Richard Booker 27. Onward Muslim Soldiers by Robert Spencer 28.Unprophet: Islam, The Largest Cult in History by Anonymous

http://www.faithfreedom.org

http://rationalthinking.humanists.net

http://www.islamreview.org/KoranKafir/index.html

http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/theism/islam/index.shtml

http://www.hinduunity.org/articles/islamexposed/islammain.html

http://www.sullivan-county.com/x/

http://www.islamreview.org/AnwarShaikh/index1.html

http://www.geocities.com/inquisitive79/islam.html

http://www.primechoice.com/philosophy/

http://thespiritofislam.com/

http://derafsh-kaviyani.com/english/

http://atheism.about.com/library/FAQs/islam/blfaq_islam_index.htm

http://www.geocities.com/avijitroy/Maurice_Bucaille/anstoBucaille.htm

http://www.muslimsandislamic2.faithweb.com/

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Rhodes/3543/Islamgn.htm

http://members.lycos.nl/whatsthisthen/links.html

http://www.mukto-mona.com/Articles/jahed/experience.htm

http://www.humanists.net/avijit/article/10_myths_about_Quran.htm

http://www.sullivan-county.com/id2/

http://humanists.net/avijit/article/western_scientists_.htm

http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1046

http://www.bible.ca/islam/islam-koran-fairy-tales-dr-morey.htm

http://www.islamundressed.com/

http://www.biblia.com/islam/war.htm

http://tfaiiaft.tf.funpic.org/islam.html

http://www.lamblion.com/New08.php

http://www.johnnyleeclary.com/islam.htm

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1358699/posts

http://humanists.net/alisina/cult_or_religion.htm

http://www.webspawner.com/users/islamicjihad4/

http://www.islam-in-focus.com/

http://www.bible.ca/islam/islam-koran-bible.htm

http://www.nowscape.com/islam/index.htm

http://humanists.net/avijit/aroj_ali/secular_article.htm

http://www.cdu.jesusanswers.com/islam.html

http://in.news.yahoo.com/061004/139/6869s.html

http://www.keithhunt.com/Islam.html

http://islamvslogic.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_islamvslogic_archive.html

http://www.answering-islam.org/Books/Muir/index.htm

http://www.answering-islam.org/Books/index.htm

http://www.hinduunity.com/links.html

http://www.aetheronline.com/mario/Heretic/leave_islam.htm

http://debate.org.uk/topics/home.htm

http://www.sullivan-county.com/id3/bahai_educators.htm

http://www.geocities.com/freethoughtmecca/critstudrein.html

http://www.geocities.com/hammihanirani/islam.html

http://www.hraic.org/links/

http://www.studytoanswer.net/myths_ch8.html

http://www.islamreview.com

http://www.souldevice.org/quran2.htm

http://www.truthnet.org/islam/Qurangil5.html

http://www.hebroots.org/hebrootsarchive/0111/0111r.html

http://www.notislam.com/id6.html

http://www.dayton-fgbmfi.org/luckhoo01.htm

http://www.geocities.com/pvrosman/Islam_Is_Satanic_And_NOT_Peaceful.html

http://www.hauns.com/~DCQu4E5g/muhammad.html

http://www.gregandsheila.com/ag/islam.htm

http://www.thriceholy.net/internal.html#Family_Values

http://www.yesha.org.il/islam.htm

http://www.daveandangel.com/CRN/Exposing_the_Koran.shtml

http://www.masada2000.org/islam.html

http://nowscape.com/islam/

http://www.religionandsecularism3.gq.nu/favorite_links.html

http://www.revoltofreason.net/islamandterror.htm

http://www.bharatvani.org/books/tcqp/chi3.htm

http://www.liberator.net/articles/TremblayFrancois/Islam.html

http://www.primechoice.com/philosophy/jihad.htm

http://forumhub.com/expr/9729.25255.23.22.39.html

http://www.webspawner.com/users/islamicjihad4/

http://www.apostatesofislam.com/main.htm

http://www.efsha.co.uk/english/quran/miracles.htm

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/islam.htm

http://www.human.st/alisina/slaying_islam.htm

http://www.primechoice.com/philosophy/shelp/muhammad.htm

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Ithaca/3440/islam.html

http://www.biblia.com/islam/islam.htm

http://bensmazelworld.showsit.info/

http://fruitofislam.com/plain_truth_about_islam.htm

http://www.transworldevangelism.com/Islamic%20Perspective3.html

http://www.bloomington.in.us/~lgthscac/islam.htm

http://www.jihadwatch.org/

http://www.webspawner.com/users/islamarticle6/

http://www.webspawner.com/users/islamicjihadarticles/

http://www.w3church.org/ISLAM1.html

http://www.masada2000.org/Unmasking-Islam.html

http://www.dhushara.com/book/sakina/isl/islam.htm

http://www.thespiritofislam.com/books/imk/

http://davidsonpress.com/islam/

http://www.venusproject.com/prophet_of_doom/toc.html

http://islamcommentaries.com/islam/morey.htm

http://www.knowislam.info/drupal/

http://www.rahoorkhuit.net/ota/crossi/mohammad_is_a_false_prophet.html

http://www.touchet1611.org/IslamRealities.html

http://www.hope-of-israel.org/islam.htm

http://nowscape.com/islam/islam.htm

http://www.answer-islam.org/Polemics.html

http://www.liberty-and-culture.com/pages/2/

http://www.studytoanswer.net/islam_myths.html

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/002080.html

http://www.muhammadanism.com/Muhammad/Muhammad_Terrorism.htm

http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/islam.htm#violence

http://www.bible.ca/islam/islam-questions.htm

http://www.islamreview.com/articles.htm

http://www.geocities.com/gary_bee_za/muhammad/

http://www.thebereancall.org/Newsletters/2003+Newsletters/4467.aspx

http://peace-of-mind.net/Islam.htm

http://home.ntelos.net/~userper/religion/answer_islam.htm

http://www.bible.ca/islam/islam-koran-fairy-tales-dr-morey.htm

http://www.blessedcause.org/TOC/Terrorist%20Militant%20Islam.htm

http://www.bibleprobe.com/muhammad.htm

http://www.abrahamic-faith.com/mohammed-the-false-prophet.html

http://www.sillymuhammad.com/main.htm

http://www.geocities.com/end_of_times/islam.html

http://www.islamlies.com/

http://www.answer-islam.org/Islamprophets.html

http://www.webspawner.com/users/islamicjihad27/

http://www.sullivan-county.com/id2/

http://www.webspawner.com/users/islamicjihad6/

http://www.peace-of-mind.net/Islam.htm

http://www.awitness.org/news/november_2001/humanist_muslim.html In the websites below, you’ll see how much muslims themselves distrust and reject the Hadiths. It clearly shows how unreliable, untrustworthy and dubious the Hadiths are : 1. Quran, Hadith, And Islam by Rashad Khalifa ( This is a book written by a muslim. Beware ! Being written by a muslim, it supports Islam. But the beauty of this book is that it clearly explains why the Hadiths are unreliable, untrustworthy and dubious. )

http://www.quran.org/trashhadith.htm ,

http://www.universalunity.org/18.html

http://www.free-minds.org/hadithcon.htm

http://www.universalunity.net/HADITH_A_Re_Evaluation.htm#8

http://www.free-minds.org/naveed.htm

http://www.geocities.com/haleem1955/hadithmyth.htm

http://groups.msn.com/SubmissionToGodAlone/quranvshadith.msnw

http://www.irfi.org/Islamic%20Articles%20Folder%204/which_hadith_do_you_believe.htm

http://www.bigissueground.com/atheistground/asadi-koranandhadith.shtml

http://ropers.hypermart.net/associate/Contributed%20Articles/usman/hadith/hadith-content.html

http://www.altway.freeuk.com/Answers/179-ReHadith.htm

Historyofjihad’s Reply: Keep up with your good work of exposing Islam.

____________________

* For those uninitiated, PBUH expands to Perpetual Battle Upon Hagarism (Islam) – founded by the mass-murderer and pedophile pretender prophet Mohammed-ibn-Abdallah (Yimach Shmo – May his name and memory be obliterated).

______________________________________

Select Bibliography The Mummy, Funeral Rites & Customs in Ancient Egypt, by Ernest A. Wallis Budge, reprint of 1893 edition by Senate Studio Editions 1995

The Twilight of Ancient Egypt, First Millennium B.C.E., by Karol Mysliwiec, translated by David Lorton, Cornell University Press2000

Egypt in The Age of Cleopatra, by Michel Chauveau, translated by David Lorton, Cornell University Press, 2000

Women in Ancient Egypt, by Gay Robins, Harvard University Press, 1996

Women and Society in Greek and Roman Egypt: A Source Book by Jane Rowlandson, Cambridge University Press, 1998

The Chronicle of John Coptic Bishop of Nikiu (circa 690 A.D.), translated by Robert Henry Charles, reprint from 1916 edition, APA-Philo Press Amsterdam, Holland

The Vanished Library, A Wonder of The Ancient World, by Luciano Canfora, University of California Press

The Story of The Church of Egypt, Volumes I and II, by Edith L. Butcher, reprint of 1897 edition by AMS Press Inc, New York, N.Y 1975

Coptic Egypt, by Murad Kamil, Le Scribe Egyptien, 1968

Traditional Egyptian Christianity, A History of the Coptic Church, by Theodore. Hall Patrick, Fisher Park Press, 1999

Muslim Extremism in Egypt, The Prophet and the Pharaoh, by Gilles Kepel, University of California Press 1993

Ancient Egyptian Culture, published by Chartwell Books, Edison, N.J. 1998.

Samson Blinded: A Machiavellian Perspective on the Middle East Conflict, by Obadiah Shoher

Jihad in the West: Muslim Conquests from the 7th to the 21st Centuries (Hardcover) by Paul Fregosi

The Sword of the Prophet: History, Theology, Impact on the World by Srdja Trifkovic

Islam Unveiled: Disturbing Questions About the World's Fastest Growing Faith by Robert Spencer

Studies in Muslim Apocalyptic (Studies in Late Antiquity and Early Islam) by David Cook

Why I Am Not a Muslim by Ibn Warraq

Onward Muslim Soldiers by Robert Spencer

Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis by Bat Ye'Or

Islam and Dhimmitude: Where Civilizations Collide by Bat Yeor

What the Koran Really Says: Language, Text, and Commentary by Ibn Warraq

Islam and Terrorism: What the Quran Really Teaches About Christianity, Violence and the Goals of the Islamic Jihad by Mark A. Gabriel, Mark A. Gabriel

A Concise History of the Crusades by Thomas F. Madden

The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) by Robert Spencer

The Great Divide: The failure of Islam and the Triumph of the West by Marvin Olasky

The Myth of Islamic Tolerance: How Islamic Law Treats Non-Muslims by Robert Spencer

Islam Unveiled: Disturbing Questions About the World's Fastest Growing Faith by Robert Spencer, David Pryce-Jones

The Koran (Penguin Classics) by N. J. Dawood

Don't Keep me Silent! One Woman's Escape from the Chains of Islam by Mina Nevisa

Christianity And Islam: The Final Clash by Robert Livingston

Holiest Wars : Islamic Mahdis, Their Jihads, and Osama bin Laden by Timothy R. Furnish

The Last Trumpet: A Comparative Study in Christian-Islamic Eschatology by Samuel, Ph.D. Shahid

Unleashing the beast: How a fanatical islamic dictator will form a ten-nation coalition and terrorize the world for forty-two months by Perry Stone

Contemporary Muslim Apocalyptic Literature (Religion and Politics) by David Cook

Islam and the Jews: The Unfinished Battle by Mark A., Ph.D. Gabriel

The Challenge of Islam to Christians by David Pawson

The Prophetic Fall of the Islamic Regime by Glenn Miller, Roger Loomis

Prophet of Doom : Islam's Terrorist Dogma in Muhammad's Own Words by Craig Winn

The False Prophet by Ellis H. Skolfield

The Approach of Armageddon: An Islamic Perspective by Muhammad Hisham Kabbani

The Cube and the Cathedral: Europe, America, and Politics Without God by George Weigel

Infiltration : How Muslim Spies and Subversives have Penetrated Washington by Paul Sperry

Unholy Alliance : Radical Islam and the American Left by David Horowitz

Unveiling Islam : An Insider's Look at Muslim Life and Beliefs by Ergun Mehmet Caner

Perfect Soldiers : The Hijackers: Who They Were, Why They Did It by Terry McDermott

Islam Revealed A Christian Arab's View Of Islam by Anis Shorrosh

Leaving Islam: Apostates Speak Out by Ibn Warraq

The Origins of the Koran: Classic Essays on Islam's Holy Book by Ibn Warraq

________________________________

Unfortunately for humankind, the end of the death-seeking fiery cult of Islam can only come about through a fiery death-giving weapon. Ironically such nuclear mushroom clouds would be the blazing hell-fire that the Quran talks about and acknowledges will bring about an end to Islam such that there will be no one across the globe to say “Lah ilah il Allah, Mohammed ur Rasoolallah” (There is no god but allah and Mohammed is his prophet).

_____________________________________

Exclusive Coverage

Iran preparing to launch an Electro-Magnetic Pulse Nuclear war

The Nazis of Yesterday and the Qazis and Ghazis of today!
Hitler and Khamenei - The two faces of Evil

Warrantless Wiretapping of Muslim phones and Electronic Surveillance of Radiation around Mosques

Our Resolution for the New Year - Realize, Learn and Implement the only way to destroy Terrorism - Attack the Hajj, pulverize Mecca

Shape of things to come in Iraq and the world over

Ramsey Clark as Saddam's Attorney and the politics of subterfuge and murder

Kill or Be Killed - Shiites and Sunnis in a Catch 22 trap inside Iraq

How we are making Islam self-destruct

Muslim Brotherhood raises its Hood in Egypt

Our withdrawal plans and news highlights about Sunnis being tortured by Shiite prison guards and link of these two happenings with the Saudi-Iranian Sunni-Shiite Proxy War that has already started in Iraq

Sharon turns out to be the proverbial "SHEEP" in "Wolf's" clothing!

Muslims crying about deprivation of Civil Liberties and Human Rights is like a Jackal crying “Wolf”

Najaf and Fallujah - A tale of two Cities and two strategies

The Amman Blasts – the first shots of the emerging schism between the Wahabis and the Hashemites

“We should bring our troops Home to achieve our Iraq Policy goals” - A Republican Neocon view

Why do Arabs discriminate against other Muslims from the Ummah - Reason: Muslims are thugs. As they fight with others to commit thuggery, they also fight amongst themselves while sharing the spoils of their thuggery.

Bring our Troops home - Afterall Cindy does actually have a point

Idle Minds are a Devil's Workshop, but in France we are confronting the Devils' Mind

The simple use of demographics of democracy against our enemy

Know the mind of the enemy if we are to defeat those who brought us sorrow

How are Muslims like women?

Shiite-Sunni War coming in Iraq and then across the Middle East

"Winning Muslim Hearts and Minds"

Earthquake in Pakistan - Allah's Jihad against Muslims?

Can the West win a mortal combat of the War on Terror with one hand cuffed?

Are Muslims Alienated everywhere as any civilized lifestyle is alien for them?

The effective way of defeating Pre-cultural theology-inspired Islamic terrorism

Optional Scenarios if the USA does not decimate Mullah Jihadis of Iran now

What we need to change within us to defeat Islamic Terrorism

Understanding Islamic Terrorism to enable us to destroy it once and forever

How Iraq can take the entire Middle East into Apocalypse

Musharraf's Pakistan - A friend or a foe?

What does it take to win a war against theology-inspired terror?

The Root causes of Muslim Alienation and of 9/11, 3/11, 7/7

What makes Muslims glorify murder and revenge?

The cracks and contradictions within the Communist-Islamist Alliance

The real Muslim mind revealed by an Ex-Muslim

Strategy to break the Islamist-Communist Alliance

Logic behind Iran's Mullahs' Desperation to get Nuclear Weapons.

Putin's romance with Palestinians, Iranians and Syrians - Shades of Hitler-Stalin (Ribbentrop-Molotov) Pact of 1939?

Iran's Duplicity in building Nuclear weapons under the cloak of Energy Requirements recalls Hitler's duplicity of building Luftwaffe using Flying Clubs

Vietnam War and the War on Terror - similarities and differences

Islamic Terrorists Murder Students at "Immoral Picnic" Book Review: Atomic Iran - Jerome R. Corsi Security breached at US nuclear power plant

[EDITORIAL]


A new and deadly form of Terrorism is Emerging

We are dealing with nihilists and despots who worship a death- cult. They hate modern liberalism and democracy and their ideology is the cousin of fascism and communism. When we faced Stalin and Hitler, the last thing we needed to do was agonize over why they didn't like our societies, lifestyles and systems of government. Neither should we do anything different in confronting the Osamas and Al Zarqawis. More....

Past Editorials

There will come a point when widespread Muslim terror attacks against the U.S. will no longer allow military actions as we have taken in Iraq and Afghanistan and will call for a re- appraisal of our military strategy…… More....

War on Terror News on Terror






 


What if the Muslims win the 3rd World War?
What would life be in the unlikely event of the Terrorists winning the 3rd world war? Would life be worth living then? »»

 
_______________________________________________________

Google
Search WWW Search Search historyofjihad.org

______________________________________________________________________ ____________

________________________________________

Write Letters to the Editor
Read Archived Letters to the Editor

______________________________________________


Read Current Letters to the Editor

______________________________________________

Free Hit Counter
Thanks for visiting

_______________________________

Free Hit Counter
Thanks for visiting